Clemson head coach Dabo Swinney took the podium on Tuesday to discuss NIL benefits and the upcoming ability for schools to pay players directly starting next season, and his tone was a stark contrast to his past views. According to Grace Raynor of The Athletic, Swinney expressed excitement about the new revenue-sharing model, eagerly anticipating Clemson’s opportunity to pay players.
“Nobody’s gonna have more money than Clemson. Nobody,” Swinney said, referring to the impending changes, adding, “For the first time ever. That’ll be good.”
With the settlement of the House lawsuit, school athletic departments can now share up to 22 percent of their TV revenue with players, which for Clemson means around $20.5 million to distribute among its sports programs, with football likely receiving the largest share.
“We’ve always had the money at Clemson. We just haven’t been able to share it,” Swinney noted.
This shift in perspective is a dramatic reversal for Swinney, who previously staunchly opposed paying players. Back in 2014, he argued that paying players would “professionalize” college athletics and said he’d “go do something else” if that happened. His comments now focus on the importance of maintaining the academic side of college athletics, though that issue was never part of the debate.
So, what’s changed? The landscape of college sports has evolved significantly. In 2014, the concept of NIL and schools directly compensating players was a distant possibility. At that time, Swinney was at the peak of his career, leading Clemson to a string of successful seasons. Today, NIL is a reality, and the transfer portal has drastically reshaped college football, giving players more power than ever before.
As Clemson’s program has experienced a decline since its last playoff appearance in 2020, Swinney is facing increased pressure. The Tigers have not been able to compete with the likes of Georgia, Alabama, and Ohio State, largely due to a lack of top-tier recruits and reluctance to embrace the transfer portal. Now, as the landscape of college football shifts, Swinney is eager to embrace changes he once opposed, signaling a potential turning point for his program. The question remains: Will this new approach be enough to help Clemson regain its former dominance?
Leave a Reply